Seiz Co. v. Arkansas State Highway & Transportation Department
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
JIM GUNTER, Justice.
Appellant, Seiz Sign Company, appeals the decision of the circuit court affirming the Arkansas Highway and Transportation Department’s (AHTD) denial of appellant’s application for a billboard sign permit. On appeal, appellant asserts that the AHTD has incorrectly interpreted Ark.Code Ann. § 27-74-210 (Repl.1994) and that there was no substantial evidence supporting the denial of the application. As this case raises an issue of statutory interpretation, this court has jurisdiction pursuant to Ark. Sup.Ct. R. l-2(b)(6). We affirm the denial of appellant’s application.
On…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited15 opinions
- People ex rel. Lungren v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- United States v. Tom Vig, United States of America v. Donovan VigCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- Grafton Partners L.P. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- Cave City Nursing Home, Inc. v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
- McQuay v. Arkansas State Board of ArchitectsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- McLane Southern, Inc. v. Arkansas Tobacco Control BoardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2010
- Arkansas Times LP v. Mark WaldripCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2022
- Louisiana v. Joint Pipeline GroupSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2010
- Lamar Co. v. Arkansas State Highway & Transportation DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2011
- Arkansas State Highway & Transportation Department v. Lamar Advantage Holding Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2011
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.