Legal Opinion

Lamar Outdoor Advertising v. Arkansas Highway & Transportation Department

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided May 26, 2004No. CA 03-411Published

1Opinion of the Court

184 S.W.3d 461 (2004)

86 Ark. App. 279

LAMAR OUTDOOR ADVERTISING

v.

ARKANSAS HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT.

No. CA 03-411.

Court of Appeals of Arkansas, Divisions II, III.

May 26, 2004.

George E. Pike, Jr., North Little Rock, for appellant.

Robert L. Wilson, Chief Counsel; and Bruce P. Hurlbut, Staff Attorney, Little Rock, for appellee.

OLLY NEAL, Judge.

Lamar Outdoor Advertising appeals from the State Highway Commission's denial of its application to erect a billboard along Highway 67/167 near Jacksonville.[1] Lamar argues that the Commission erred in denying the application and that, when the…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. ACW, INC. v. WeissSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  2. Wright v. Arkansas State Plant BoardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  3. Arkansas Health Services Agency v. Desiderata, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  4. Bush v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  5. Williams v. Arkansas State Board of Physical TherapySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API