McCaleb v. Dreyfus
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
This is an action to foreclose liens upon an assessment for sewer work. Judgment passed for the plaintiff:, and the defendant property-owner appeals.
1. The specifications for the work provided that “if, in the judgment of the city engineer, it shall be necessary to form any portion of said foundation (of the sewer) of concrete, said concrete shall be paid for as extra work at the price per cubic yard mentioned in the contract.” This language forms the foundation of the principal attack made by appellant. He insists that, under the authority of Bolton v. Gilleran, 105 Cal. 244, [45 Am. St.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bolton v. GilleranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Banaz v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Barrere v. SompsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Haughawout v. RaymondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Haughawout v. HubbardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Realty Construction & Mortgage Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Stanwood v. CarsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Hildreth v. City of LongmontSupreme Court of Colorado · 1909
- Donnelly v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
- Dillingham v. WelchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.