Legal Opinion

Hildreth v. City of Longmont

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 15, 1909No. 5583; No. 3261 C. A.; No. 6201PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Error to Denver District Court. Appeal from Boulder District Court. Error to Denver District Court — Hon. John I. Mullins, Judge. Appeal from Boulder District Court — Hon. Christian A. Bennett, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gabbert

The city of Longmont took steps to construct a district sanitary sewer. After the contract was let, some of the plaintiffs in error in cause No. 5583 com*83menced suit, the purpose of which was to have the proceedings taken by the city authorities to construct the sewer system adjudged null'and void; to enjoin the city and contractors from further proceeding with its construction; and from assessing or levying upon the property of plaintiffs any taxes as their proportionate share of the expense of constructing the sewer system; and also to enjoin the issuance of any improvement bonds on account…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Taylor v. SecorSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Bolton v. GilleranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. People's National Bank v. MaryeSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  4. Commonwealth v. WoodwardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  5. Rich v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1894

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Milheim v. Moffat Tunnel Improvement DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1922
  2. Bankers Trust Co. v. International Trust Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1941
  3. Green v. City of Rock HillSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1929
  4. Western Heights Land Corp. v. City of Fort CollinsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
  5. Stone v. Union Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1940

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API