Banaz v. Smith
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtTemple, J.
Action to foreclose lien for construction of a sewer in the city of Los Angeles, under the so-called Yrooman Act, passed March 18,1885, as amended in 1889,1891, and 1893.
The second amended complaint was demurred to for insufficient facts. It was overruled, and the appellant answered. Judgment was for plaintiff, and this appeal is from the judgment and from an order denying a new trial.
1. Most, if not all, points urged here arise upon the demurrer. The first is, that the authority given the contractor to collect is in violation of section 13 of article XI of the constitution. That section…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Fallbrook Irrigation District v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Lent v. TillsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Davies v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Byrne v. DrainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Thomason v. AshworthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Younger v. County of El DoradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Duncan v. RamishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Lindemann v. San Joaquin Cotton Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1936
- Rouse v. ThompsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
- Grayson-Robinson Stores Inc. v. Oneida Ltd.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1953
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.