Legal Opinion
Moasser v. Becker
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided July 29, 2003No. AC 22819PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*307 Opinion
SCHALLER, J.
In this action to foreclose three judgment liens, the defendant Judith Becker1 appeals from the trial court’s judgment of foreclosure by sale. On appeal, the defendant claims that the court improperly (1) denied her motions to dismiss the action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, (2) precluded her from relitigating an issue that had been litigated before she became a party to the action and (3) accepted an attorney trial referee’s finding that the defendant had violated the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (UFTA), General Statutes § 52-552a et seq.2 We affirm the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Fort Trumbull Conservancy, LLC v. AlvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Hatt v. Burlington Coat FactorySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Nizzardo v. State Traffic CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Massingill v. DownsSupreme Court of the United States · 1849
- Niehaus v. Cowles Business Media, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Monetary Funding Group, Inc. v. PluchinoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Wallenta v. MoscowitzConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- BNY Western Trust v. RomanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Cahaly v. Benistar Property Exchange Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Russo Roofing, Inc. v. RottmanConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.