Danzig v. PDPA, INC.
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BEAR, J.
The defendant PDPA, Inc. (PDPA), appeals from the judgment of foreclosure by sale rendered by the trial court in favor of the plaintiff, Richard A. Danzig, trustee for the Defined Benefit Pension Trust. On appeal, PDPA claims that the court improperly refused to allow it the opportunity to plead in response to the plaintiffs amended complaint. Additionally, the plaintiff raises questions about PDPA’s standing and whether the appeal has been taken from a final judgment. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following relevant facts and complicated procedural history are…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Webster Bank v. ZakSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. VollConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- Capp Industries, Inc. v. SchoenbergConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Bank of America, FSB v. FrancoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Mazulis v. ZeldnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Gonzalez v. Ocwen Home Loan ServicingDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2015
- Stone v. PattisConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Moran v. MorneauConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Saunders v. KDFBS, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2020
- Dadi v. DanzigSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.