Legal Opinion

. 39 ACRES v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)

Decided March 25, 2008No. 06-07-00101-CVPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

Justice MOSELEY.

The previous ruling in this case as decided on January 16, 2008, 1 is withdrawn and this opinion is rendered in its stead.

Henry Doke appeals from a judgment after a bench trial of the forfeiture pursuant to Chapter 59 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure of three contiguous tracts of .39 acres, .748 acres, and .5 acres in Marion County. Although a .22 caliber Ruger pistol is also subject to the forfeiture proceedings, no mention is made of it in the proceedings except to declare its forfeiture.

Pursuant to Article 59.01 of the Texas Code of Criminal…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. HavnerTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  3. In the interest of C.H.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
  4. In the Interest of J.F.C.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Ford Motor Co. v. RidgwayTexas Supreme Court · 2004

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Lambright v. Trahan, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2010
  2. Ferrara v. Moore, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2010
  3. Carl Storck and Vicki Storck v. Tres Lagos Property Owners Association, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2014
  4. Hydrogeo, LLC v. Quitman Independent School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
  5. Paradigm Oil, Inc. v. Retamco Operating, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2010

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API