Legal Opinion

Ford Motor Co. v. Ridgway

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 2004No. 02-0552PublishedCited by 2,150 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Phillips

We must decide whether the evidence offered by plaintiffs in response to the defendant’s Rule 166a(i) summary judgment motion created a genuine issue of material fact that a manufacturing defect in the defendant’s product caused the plaintiffs injuries. Because we hold that the court of appeals erred in holding that the evidence was sufficient, we reverse the judgment of the court of appeals, 82 S.W.3d 26, and render judgment that the plaintiffs take nothing.

I

Jack Ridgway sustained serious injuries when his two-year-old Ford F-150 pick-up truck caught fire while he was driving. Ridgway was…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. HavnerTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Kindred v. Con/Chem, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1983
  3. American Tobacco Co., Inc. v. GrinnellTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Transportation Insurance Co. v. MorielTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Johnson v. Brewer & Pritchard, P.C.Texas Supreme Court · 2002

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2,150 opinions

  1. City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  2. MacK Trucks, Inc. v. TamezTexas Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Homer Merriman v. Xto Energy, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2013
  4. First United Pentecostal Church of Beaumont v. ParkerTexas Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Kroger Texas Ltd. Partnership v. SuberuTexas Supreme Court · 2006

2,145 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API