Legal Opinion

Eisenring v. Kansas Turnpike Authority

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 6, 1958No. 41,104PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Schroeder, J.:

This is a condemnation action arising from the separate appeal of a lessee when the Kansas Turnpike Authority condemned part of the land upon which the lessee had a sand lease.

From a verdict and judgment in favor of the lessee the Kansas Turnpike Authority duly perfected an appeal presenting the questions hereafter discussed.

Damages to the landowner by reason of the condemnation of this particular tract of land were disposed of by settlement in another case, after the original opinion of this court was announced in Moore v. Kansas…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Montana Railway Co. v. WarrenSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Pennsylvania Threshermen & Farmers' Mutual Casualty Insurance v. MessengerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1943
  3. Korf v. FlemingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1948
  4. Bales v. Wichita Midland Valley RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  5. Lebanon & Nashville Turnpike Co. v. CrevelingTennessee Supreme Court · 1929

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Casey v. Phillips Pipeline Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1967
  2. Bonanza, Inc. v. McLeanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1987
  3. State Highway Commission v. LeeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1971
  4. City of Wichita v. EisenringSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
  5. City of Wichita v. Unified School District No. 259Supreme Court of Kansas · 1968

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API