Legal Opinion

Smith v. State Highway Commission

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 7, 1959No. 41,440PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion o£ the court was delivered by

Schroeder, J.:

This appeal arises from a proceeding in eminent domain by the State Highway Commission to (1) acquire an easement for a channel change and borrow, and simultaneously to (2) acquire rights of access along a limited portion of the landowners’ frontage on an existing highway. The parties stipulated the amount of the appraisers’ award for the easement was just compensation thereby leaving as the single issue in the trial court the restriction of access.

It is uncontroverted that the landowners had the same number of entrances to their premises…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Atkin v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  3. Schaake v. DolleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  4. Riddle v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
  5. Sutton v. FrazierSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Brock v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1965
  2. Jones v. GarrettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1963
  3. St. Clair County v. BukacekSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
  4. Lone Star Industries, Inc. v. Secretary of the Kansas Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  5. Anhoco Corporation v. Dade CountySupreme Court of Florida · 1962

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API