In Re Michihiko Ochiai, Taiiti Okada, Osami Aki, Akira Morimoto, Kenji Kawakita, and Yoshihiro Matsushita
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Per curiam
This appeal is from the July 8, 1992, decision of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (Board) affirming the examiner’s rejection of claims 6 through 10 of Michihiko Ochiai et alls (collectively “Ochiai”) application serial no. 07/462,492, claiming priority from parent application serial no. 642,356, filed December 19,1975, now U.S. Patent No. 4,098,888 (methods for the manufacture of cephems). Ex parte Ochiai, 24 USPQ2d 1265 (Bd.Pat.App. & Int.1992). The real party in interest is Takeda Chemical Industries, Ltd., the assignee of any…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Application of Viktor PapeschCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
- In Re David H. FineCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- In Re Diane M. DillonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Application of Aubrey A. LarsenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1961
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Litton Systems, Inc. v. Honeywell, Inc., Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Celestaire, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. v. DudasDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Torpharm, Inc. v. Ranbaxy Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Grape Technology Group, Inc. v. Jingle Networks, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.