Legal Opinion

Grape Technology Group, Inc. v. Jingle Networks, Inc.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided January 9, 2012No. Case Civ. A. No. 08-408 (GMS)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

GREGORY M. SLEET, Chief Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

In this patent infringement action, plaintiffs Grape Technology Group, Inc. and KGP, Inc. (collectively, “Grape”) allege that the advertiser-supported directory assistance service provided by Jingle Networks, Inc. (“Jingle”) infringes the asserted claims of the patents-in-suit.1 (D.I. 1.) The court held a six-day jury trial in this matter on December 3 through December 9, 2010. (D.I. 175.) At trial, Jingle properly moved for judgment as a matter of law (“JMOL”) on a number of grounds pursuant to Rule 50(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  3. Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  4. Allied Chemical Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lincoln v. MX Technologies, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API