In Re David H. Fine
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MAYER, Circuit Judge.
David H. Fine appeals from a decision of the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (Board) affirming the rejection of certain claims of his application, Serial No. 512,374, and concluding that his invention would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art and was therefore unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103. We reverse.
BACKGROUND
A. The Invention.
The invention claimed is a system for detecting and measuring minute quantities of nitrogen compounds. According to Fine, the system has the ability to detect…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Stratoflex, Inc. v. Aeroquip CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc., Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Garlock, Inc., Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Panduit Corporation v. Dennison Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Acs Hospital Systems, Inc., Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Montefiore Hospital and Wells National Services Corporation, Appellees/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Raytheon Company, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Roper Corporation, Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by81 opinions
- In Re David C. PaulsenCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- In Re Sang-Su LeeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- In Re Patrick H. O'farrell, Barry A. Polisky and David H. GelfandCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Ecolochem, Inc. v. Southern California Edison CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Iron Grip Barbell Company, Inc., and York Barbell Company, Inc. v. USA Sports, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.