Legal Opinion

Marriage of Iverson v. Iverson

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 6, 1988No. C6-88-2241PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPECIAL TERM OPINION

WOZNIAK, Chief Judge.

FACTS

A dissolution judgment was entered on June 10, 1988. Appellant’s motion for amended findings or a new trial was denied by order on September 28. (The trial court did correct two clerical errors.) This appeal was filed on October 27 from the order denying a new trial. Respondent moves to dismiss for failure to timely appeal from the judgment.

DECISION

An appeal may be taken from a judgment within 90 days after its entry. Minn. R.Civ.App.P. 104.01. The last day to appeal from the June 10 dissolution judgment in this case was September 8. No appeal has…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Schaust v. TOWN BD. OF HOLLYWOOD TP., CARVER CTY.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  2. Honeymead Products Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  3. Alholm v. WiltCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  4. In Re Estate of WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Vangsness v. VangsnessCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
  2. Waldner v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
  3. Hackett v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
  4. Estate of Spiess v. SchummCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
  5. Jean A. Swanson v. Summit Orthopedics, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API