Legal Opinion
Waldner v. Peterson
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided October 31, 1989No. C7-89-1660PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOZNIAK, Chief Judge.
Respondent Waldner brought a conciliation court action against appellant Peterson. Peterson counterclaimed and removed the case to the district court. The trial court ordered judgment entered in Waldner’s favor.
Judgment was entered May 19, 1989. Peterson timely moved for a new trial; his motion was denied. This appeal from the judgment and the order denying Peterson’s motion for a new trial was filed September 14, 1989. Peterson seeks to raise the following issues:(a) Was the chiropractor’s notice of rights sufficient to allow recovery from a patient pursuant to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Thayer v. American Financial Advisers, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Sauter v. WasemillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Schaust v. TOWN BD. OF HOLLYWOOD TP., CARVER CTY.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Marriage of Iverson v. IversonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
- Marriage of Amatuzio v. AmatuzioCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Wenzel v. WenzelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- Lake Superior Center Authority v. Hammel, Green & Abrahamson, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- Erickson Ex Rel. Bunker v. American Honda Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
- State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
- Custody of the Child of Williams v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.