Legal Opinion

Hackett v. State, Department of Natural Resources

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 13, 1993No. C7-93-724PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPECIAL TERM OPINION

ANDERSON, Chief Judge.

FACTS

Respondents alleged breach of contract and other claims against appellant State of Minnesota, Department of Natural Resources, with respect to appellant’s acquisition of property for a recreational trail. Appellant seeks review of a January 14, 1993 judgment on the merits and a January 15, 1993 order denying a new trial.

This court questioned jurisdiction because it was unclear whether all of the parties’ claims had been adjudicated. Both parties submitted memoranda stating that no claims remained for the trial court’s determination.

In their…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gruenhagen v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  2. Sauter v. WasemillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  3. Marriage of Iverson v. IversonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
  4. Stockdale Bancorporation v. KjellbergCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
  5. Muehlstedt v. City of Lino LakesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Benson v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
  2. Benson v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API