Legal Opinion
Alholm v. Wilt
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided May 8, 1984No. C0-83-1163PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FORSBERG, Judge.
This is an appeal from an order of the trial court denying appellant’s motion for a new trial. Appellant argued in his motion that the trial court erred in directing a verdict in favor of respondent Lakeside Bar on the issue of innkeeper’s liability. Appellant has also raised several new evidentiary issues upon appeal which were not raised in his motion for a new trial. Those issues cannot be considered at this time. See Rathbun v. W.T. Grant Co., 300 Minn. 223, 219 N.W.2d 641 (1974). Respondent Lakeside Bar has contested the timeliness of this appeal. Lakeside has also…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Rathbun v. WT Grant CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Sylvester v. Northwestern Hospital of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- Klingbeil v. TruesdellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- Sullivan v. F. D. Chapman Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Zinnel v. Berghuis Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Alholm v. WiltSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Merchants National Bank v. Simrell's Sports Bar & Grill, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- Ember v. B.F.D., Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1986
- Holiday Inns, Inc. v. ShelburneDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- In Re the Alleged Mental Illness Of: CordieCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.