Rivera v. Heyman
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LEISURE, District Judge.
Before this Court is defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings, pursuant to Rule 12(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the reasons stated below, the defendants’ motion is granted.
BACKGROUND
The following facts are taken from the allegations in the complaint, 1 which must, for the purposes of this motion, be taken as true. Plaintiff Amador Rivera (“Rivera”) has been employed by the Smithsonian Institution’s New York Museum Complex as a security officer since 1979. He began work at the Cooper Hewitt Museum in New York and was promoted…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Brown v. General Services AdministrationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Clement SUMNER, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Harsco Corp. v. SeguiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Joann S. Reed, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. A.W. Lawrence & Co., Inc., Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Amador Rivera v. I. Michael Heyman, Secretary, Smithsonian Institution, Luis A. Palau and Edward G. DolanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Nicastro v. RunyonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Milione v. City University of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Dollinger v. State Insurance FundDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1999
- Kevin O'ROuRke v. Smithsonian Institution Press and the Smithsonian Institution, Docket No. 04-0151-CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.