Legal Opinion
Kevin O'ROuRke v. Smithsonian Institution Press and the Smithsonian Institution, Docket No. 04-0151-Cv
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided February 16, 2005No. 113PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KEARSE, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff pro se Kevin O’Rourke appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Kimba M. Wood, Judge, dismissing his amended complaint (“Complaint”) against defendants Smithsonian Institution and its operating unit the Smithsonian Institution Press (collectively the “Smithsonian”) for copyright infringement. The district court granted the Smithsonian’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction on the ground that 28 U.S.C. § 1498(b) gives the United States Court of Federal Claims exclusive jurisdiction…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Lane v. PenaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Catherine Cotton v. I. Michael Heyman, Secretary, the Smithsonian InstitutionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
- Expeditions Unlimited Aquatic Enterprises, Inc., a Corporation, Norman Scott v. Smithsonian InstitutionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Amador Rivera v. I. Michael Heyman, Secretary, Smithsonian Institution, Luis A. Palau and Edward G. DolanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Cohen v. Postal Holdings, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
- d'Abrera v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Raven v. SajetCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. MuddDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Potter v. Toei Animation IncorporatedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.