Legal Opinion
Nicastro v. Runyon
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 29, 1999No. 98 Civ. 0386(CM)PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT DISMISSING THE COMPLAINT
McMAHON, District Judge.
Defendant has moved for summary judgment, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(b) in this employment discrimination and retaliation case. The standard for granting summary judgment is almost too well-known to be reiterated. Summary judgment is appropriate when there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. Such a motion serves “to isolate and dispose of factually unsupported claims.” Celotex Corp. v.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Joseph E. Dister v. The Continental Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Beate Bernheim v. Jeffrey LittCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Joann S. Reed, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. A.W. Lawrence & Co., Inc., Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Saenger v. Montefiore Medical CenterDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Hill v. Rayboy-BrauesteinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Bennett v. Watson Wyatt & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Murray v. Visiting Nurse Services of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Frisenda v. INCORPORATED VILLAGE OF MALVERNEDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2011
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.