Legal Opinion

Steffen v. General Telephone Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 11, 1978No. CA77-06-0069PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Black J.

Plaintiffs appeal from an order dismissing their action, granted for the reason that the trial court had no jurisdiction of the subject matter set forth in the complaint, the amended complaint or the second amended complaint. * In its opinion, the trial court stated its conclusions that all the questions raised in the three complaints are about services rendered by the appellee telephone companies, and that the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio had exclusive jurisdiction of all such questions, under State, ex rel. Northern Ohio Telephone Co., v. Winter (1970), 23 Ohio St. 2d 6.

It is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Columbus Finance, Inc. v. HowardOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  3. State ex rel. Northern Ohio Telephone Co. v. WinterOhio Supreme Court · 1970
  4. LeCrone v. Ohio Bell Telephone Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1963
  5. State ex rel. Columbia Gas of Ohio, Inc. v. KiroffOhio Supreme Court · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Blankenship v. Cincinnati Milacron Chemicals, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State ex rel. Bush v. SpurlockOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Avco Financial Services Loan, Inc. v. HaleOhio Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. MacDonald v. BernardOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  5. McHenry v. Industrial CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1990

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API