LeCrone v. Ohio Bell Telephone Co.
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtDueeey, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment of the Common Pleas Court of Franklin County. The action is one in in tentional tort for invasion of privacy. The judgment was rendered upon dgf endant-appellee’s motion for a directed verdict at the close of plaintiff-appellant’s case. The evidence must therefore be construed most favorably to the plaintiff and where sufficient to raise an issue of fact must be resolved in plaintiff’s favor.
Plaintiff, Mary LeCrone (nee Dodge), was the wife of Clayton LeCrone. They resided at 230 Rosslyn Avenue, Columbus, Ohio, for about twelve years. In early 1960, a divorce…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Roach v. HarperWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1958
- McDaniel v. Atlanta Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
- People v. TrieberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Rhodes v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
- People v. AppelbaumNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Nader v. General Motors Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1970
- Javier Luis v. Joseph ZangCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- Drew Pearson and Jack Anderson v. Thomas J. DoddCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
- Hamberger v. EastmanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1964
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.