Legal Opinion

Bush v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1995No. 94-43PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAYLOR, Justice.

Appellant appeals his convictions for burglary and accessory after the fact to escape. Appellant argues the jury instructions were defective and there was insufficient evidence to support the burglary conviction.

We affirm in part and reverse in part.

I.ISSUES

Appellant presents the following issues:

I. Whether the trial court’s instructions to the jury regarding Count II of the Information, felony accessory after the fact, were fundamentally defective due to their omission of an essential element of the crime charged?

II. Assuming the felony accessory after the fact instructions…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Yates v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Cloman v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Vigil v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Price v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1991

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Dettloff v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Doherty v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Tanner v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Urbigkit v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Kenyon v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API