Bush v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
TAYLOR, Justice.
Appellant appeals his convictions for burglary and accessory after the fact to escape. Appellant argues the jury instructions were defective and there was insufficient evidence to support the burglary conviction.
We affirm in part and reverse in part.
I.ISSUES
Appellant presents the following issues:
I. Whether the trial court’s instructions to the jury regarding Count II of the Information, felony accessory after the fact, were fundamentally defective due to their omission of an essential element of the crime charged?
II. Assuming the felony accessory after the fact instructions…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Yates v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Cloman v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
- Vigil v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
- Price v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Dettloff v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
- Doherty v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
- Tanner v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
- Urbigkit v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
- Kenyon v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.