Legal Opinion

Price v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 1991No. 89-135PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MACY, Justice.

Appellant Arlen Joe Price appeals from his conviction for first-degree murder.

We affirm.

Appellant presents the following issues for our review:

I. Because the jury instructions and the form of the verdict gave the jury the choice between two theories of the first degree murder — premeditated or felony murder — and it is impossible to determine upon which theory the jury based its verdict, and because the court determined at the end of the defense’s case that there was insufficient evidence of aggravated robbery as a matter of law, Appellant is entitled to a new trial.

II.…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Stromberg v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Yates v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. McGautha v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Harrison v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Brown v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. State v. MottArizona Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Engberg v. MeyerWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Bloomquist v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Bouwkamp v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Tanner v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API