Legal Opinion

Kumar v. Schiedler

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 22, 1994No. 93C-11711; CA A81220PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*574LEESON, J.

Petitioner appeals from a judgment dismissing his petition for post-conviction relief. We reverse.

In 1991, petitioner was convicted of second-degree manslaughter and third-degree assault. On appeal, we affirmed without opinion, and the Supreme Court denied review. State v. Kumar, 117 Or App 595, 844 P2d 286, rev den 316 Or 142 (1993).

Petitioner then filed a pro se petition for post-conviction relief, along with an affidavit of indigency and a motion for the appointment of counsel. The trial court did not appoint counsel. Instead, it dismissed the petition on its own motion, on the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rodacker v. State of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ramsey v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  2. Schelin v. MaassCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  3. Knox v. NoothCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  4. Bates v. CzerniakCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  5. Evans v. NoothCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API