Legal Opinion

Knox v. Nooth

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 29, 2011No. 06065214P; A137526PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

Petitioner appeals a judgment denying his petition for post-conviction relief, raising five assignments of error. We write to address only one of them, viz., that the trial court erred in granting a motion by petitioner’s appointed counsel to withdraw as his counsel and in ordering petitioner to proceed pro se. We agree with petitioner on that assignment and, accordingly, reverse and remand.

Petitioner was convicted of a number of sexual offenses. He filed an appeal from the convictions, and we affirmed them. State v. Knox, 201 Or App 733, 122 P3d 143 (2005), rev den, 340 Or 34, cert den, 549…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Peeples v. LampertOregon Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Young v. RagenSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Shipman v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Church v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  5. State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 2008

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Breece v. AmsberryUmatilla County Circuit Court, Oregon · 2016
  2. Winstead v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  3. State v. DaleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  4. Goodlette v. CauseyCoos County Circuit Court, Oregon · 2016
  5. Bailey v. NoothCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API