Legal Opinion

Rodacker v. State of Oregon

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 23, 1986No. 84-0946C; CA A33885PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.

This is an appeal from an order dismissing a petition for post-conviction relief and denying petitioner’s request for appointed counsel. Petitioner was convicted of grand larceny in 1971. On the basis of that conviction, he was found guilty of being an exconvict in possession of a firearm, ORS 166.270(1), by the Washington County Circuit Court in 1974. In July, 1984, the judgment on the 1971 grand larceny charge was vacated by a federal district court.

In August, 1984, petitioner filed this petition for relief from the 1974 conviction, pursuant to ORS 138.510 to 138.680. He simultaneously…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kumar v. SchiedlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  2. Neill v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  3. Howell v. FrankeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  4. Kumar v. SchiedlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API