Legal Opinion

Schelin v. Maass

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 9, 1997No. 93-C-13010; CA A91130PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, J.

The state, which prevailed in this appeal from the denial of post-conviction relief, ORS 138.510 et seq, petitioned to recover various costs, including a filing fee of $60, ORS 20.310(2); ORS 21.020(2); costs of printing respondent’s brief, ORS 20.310(1); ORAP 13.05(6)(a); and a prevailing party fee of $100, ORS 20.190(l)(a). Petitioner objects, asserting that such costs are not recoverable in an appeal from the allowance or denial of post-conviction relief. We conclude that the state is not entitled to recover an appearance fee, but is entitled to recover the cost of printing its brief and a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Kumar v. SchiedlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ramsey v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  2. Lopez v. NoothCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  3. Elkins v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  4. Felkel v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  5. Evans v. NoothCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API