Legal Opinion

Bates v. Czerniak

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 20, 2003No. 01C-17475; A116288PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, P. J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment dismissing his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. ORS 34.310 - 34.730. Because we hold that the trial court did not commit error apparent on the face of the record when it failed to, sua sponte, treat plaintiffs petition for a writ of habeas corpus as a petition for post-conviction relief, we affirm.

The relevant facts are undisputed. In September 2001, plaintiff filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The petition alleged that his 1987 guilty plea was “not knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily made” because he was misled by his trial counsel and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Davis v. O'BRIENOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Shields v. CampbellOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Bedell v. SchiedlerOregon Supreme Court · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. SAIF Corporation v. EllerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  2. Manning v. StateCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2004
  3. State v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  4. Steltz v. CainCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  5. Steltz v. CainCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API