Abrohams v. Atlantic Mutual Insurance Agency
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Ruffin, Chief Judge.
Richard Abrohams and his minor son were injured in a motor vehicle collision with an underinsured motorist. After the collision, the Abrohams sought underinsured motorist (“UM”) benefits from Atlantic Mutual for injuries under both an automobile policy and an umbrella policy. Although the UM coverage provided by the automobile policy was not in dispute, Atlantic Mutual argued that the umbrella policy did not provide UM coverage. Atlantic Mutual filed a declaratory judgment action to resolve whether it was required to provide UM benefits to the Abrohams under their umbrella…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Lau's Corp., Inc. v. HaskinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
- Smith v. Commercial Union Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1980
- Hartbarger v. Country Mutual InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
- Mass v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Assaf v. Cincinnati InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
- Insurance Co. of State of Pa. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2009
- Apodaca v. Allstate Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2009
- Wagner v. Nationwide Mutual Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
- Massey v. Allstate Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2017
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.