Legal Opinion

Suver v. Personal Service Insurance

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 1984No. 82-1819PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliam B. Brown, J.

The issue presented by this case is whether an injured third party can state a claim for compensatory and punitive damages against an issuer of a financial responsibility bond for the malicious and willful failure to pay the amount of the bond. The court of appeals concluded *7that the responsibility of the surety was discharged when it paid the face amount of the bond. In light of the purpose of and policy behind financial responsibility bonds, this court cannot agree with that conclusion.

Personal Service Insurance Company relies on Republic-Franklin Ins. Co. v. Progressive Cas. Ins. Co.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hoskins v. Aetna Life InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Columbus Finance, Inc. v. HowardOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Hart v. Republic Mutual Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Republic-Franklin Insurance v. Progressive Casualty InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Thornton v. Personal Service InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1976

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. DADELAND DEPOT. v. St. Paul Fire and MarineSupreme Court of Florida · 2006
  2. Transamerica Premier Insurance Co. v. Brighton School District 27JSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  3. Grange Mutual Casualty Co. v. Refiners Transport & Terminal Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Dodge v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Md.Arizona Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Loyal Order of Moose, Lodge v. International Fidelity Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1990

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API