Legal Opinion

Republic-Franklin Insurance v. Progressive Casualty Insurance

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 1976No. 75-386PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

The main issue presented in this Cause is whether the Progressive financial responsibility bond is insurance. If it is not insurance, the pro-rata provision of the Republic-Franklin policy does not apply and the financial responsibility bond is excess coverage.

Although a financial responsibility bond authorized by R. C. 4509.45 is in some respects similar to liability insurance, it is significantly different from insurance. One who must post proof of financial responsibility as a prerequisite to the privilege of driving may do so by following any one of several distinct methods provided for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kerr v. Personal Service InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 1975

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Grange Mutual Casualty Co. v. Refiners Transport & Terminal Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Suver v. Personal Service InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Schmitt v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  4. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. v. Agency Rent-A-Car, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1982
  5. Schirm v. AuclairDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API