Hoskins v. Aetna Life Insurance
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilliam B. Brown, J.
*275I
A
The key issue presented is whether appellees have sufficiently pleaded a cause of action in tort, stemming from the refusal of their insurer to pay their claim, to allow them to proceed on a punitive damages claim against their insurer.
As a threshold consideration to the punitive damages claim, this court must decide whether a cause of action in tort arising out of an insurance contract lies against an insurer for its wrongful failure to pay a claim of its insured. While this court has not previously addressed this issue, it has, on numerous occasions, addressed the issue of whether tort…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Crisci v. Security InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Fletcher v. Western National Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Silberg v. California Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Columbus Finance, Inc. v. HowardOhio Supreme Court · 1975
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by313 opinions
- Peggy Greenberg and Pamela Rossmann, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated v. The Life Insurance Company of VirginiaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Canderm Pharmacal, Ltd. v. Elder Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- Universe Life Insurance v. GilesTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. PowellOhio Supreme Court · 2012
- Erie Insurance v. Hickman Ex Rel. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
308 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.