Legal Opinion

Hoskins v. Aetna Life Insurance

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 24, 1983No. 82-483PublishedCited by 313 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliam B. Brown, J.

*275I

A

The key issue presented is whether appellees have sufficiently pleaded a cause of action in tort, stemming from the refusal of their insurer to pay their claim, to allow them to proceed on a punitive damages claim against their insurer.

As a threshold consideration to the punitive damages claim, this court must decide whether a cause of action in tort arising out of an insurance contract lies against an insurer for its wrongful failure to pay a claim of its insured. While this court has not previously addressed this issue, it has, on numerous occasions, addressed the issue of whether tort…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Crisci v. Security InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Fletcher v. Western National Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. Silberg v. California Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Columbus Finance, Inc. v. HowardOhio Supreme Court · 1975

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by313 opinions

  1. Peggy Greenberg and Pamela Rossmann, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated v. The Life Insurance Company of VirginiaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  2. Canderm Pharmacal, Ltd. v. Elder Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
  3. Universe Life Insurance v. GilesTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. PowellOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Erie Insurance v. Hickman Ex Rel. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1993

308 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API