Legal Opinion

Morgan v. Andrews

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 1895PublishedCited by 31 opinions

Error to Washtenaw; Kinne, J. Case by Benjamin B. Morgan against Fred C. Andrews for libel, and for malicious interference with a contract between plaintiff and third persons. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

December 28, 1887, plaintiff entered into a written contract with Henry P. Clover and Enoch C. Bowling to construct a dress-stay machine. Payments were to be made from time to time as the work progressed, until $1,200 was paid, and payments were to be made up to $2,000 when the machine was completed and a satisfac*34tory test made. It was also provided that further payments were to he made up to $20,000 out of moneys earned by the machine. The contract contained a stipulation that the machine must be satisfactorily completed. Plaintiff, claiming that the machine was completed, brought suit in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rice v. . ManleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  2. Chipley v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1887
  3. Benton v. PrattNew York Supreme Court · 1829
  4. Ross v. MinerMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Freedman v. CampfieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Feldman v. GreenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. American Malting Co. v. KeitelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1913
  3. Union Car Advertising Co. v. CollierNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
  4. Keviczky v. LorberNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
  5. Four Nines Gold, Inc. v. 71 Const., Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1991

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API