Legal Opinion

Town of Wickenburg v. Sabin

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 1948No. 5036PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UDALL, Justice.

This appeal is from a judgment of the superior court of Maricopa County, requiring appellant, the Town of- Wickenburg, a municipal corporation, under the compulsion of a peremptory writ of mandamus to forthwith furnish to appellee, Chester Sabin, electric current and water for domestic use in his home.

The facts will be stated in the light most favorable to a sustaining of the judgment. Appellant is the owner of both the municipal water and electric distribution systems, and it has an exclusive monopoly in these fields within the boundaries of the town. Appellee Sabin is an…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. American Aniline Products, Inc. v. Lock HavenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  2. North Carolina Public Service Co. v. Southern Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  3. Phoenix Safety Investment Co. v. JamesArizona Supreme Court · 1925
  4. City of Greenwood v. ProvineMississippi Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Estate of BrashearArizona Supreme Court · 1939

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Massengill v. Yuma CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Veach v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Application of Trico Electric Cooperative, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1962
  4. De Santis v. DixonArizona Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Crownhill Homes, Inc. v. City of San AntonioCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API