Legal Opinion
Dave v. District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Department
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 9, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2008-0856PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Granting In Part Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment; Requiring Supplemental Briefing Concerning Plaintiff’s Liberty Interest Due Process Claim
RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff, Prateek Dave, is an Indian-American former cadet with the District of Columbia’s Metropolitan Police Department (“MPD”). He alleges that MPD failed to advance him and, ultimately, terminated his employment based on his race and national origin and in retaliation for his prior complaints of discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Said v. Nat'l R.R. Passenger Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Sanders v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Onyeanusi v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Dave v. District of Columbia Metropolitan Police DepartmentDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Dickerson v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.