Legal Opinion
Dave v. District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Department
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 1, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2008-0856PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Granting Defendant’s Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment
RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff, Prateek Dave, is an Indian-American former cadet with the District of Columbia’s Metropolitan Police Department (“MPD”). His complaint alleged that MPD failed to advance him and, ultimately, terminated his employment based on his race and national origin and in retaliation for his prior complaints of discrimination. Additionally, plaintiff alleged that his termination violated the due process clause of the Fifth Amendment and 42 U.S.C. § 1983 because he was not…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Jane Doe v. United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
- Mazaleski v. TreusdellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- McGinnis v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Evangelou v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Haymon v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
- Haymon v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022