Legal Opinion
Said v. Nat'l R.R. Passenger Corp.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided July 10, 2018No. Civil Action No. 15–1289 (RBW)PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REGGIE B. WALTON, United States District Judge
The plaintiff, Cheryl Renee Said, instituted this civil action against the defendant, the National Railroad Passenger Corporation ("Amtrak"), alleging violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e-2 to - 7 (2012) ("Title VII"), § 1981 of the Civil Rights Act of 1866, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 1981, the District of Columbia Human Rights Act ("DCHRA"), D.C. Code § 2-1402.11(a)(1) (2012), the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution, District of Columbia public policy, and…
2Cases cited83 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Said v. Nat'l R.R. Passenger Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- Bajaj v. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (Hud)District Court, District of Columbia · 2025
- Chang v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023
- Dickerson v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
- Graves-Buckingham v. MayorkasDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.