Legal Opinion

Utah Department of Transportation v. Ivers

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided December 8, 2005No. Case No. 20050246-CAPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GREENWOOD, Judge:

T1 This case involves a taking of private property by Plaintiff Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT) to construct a frontage road adjacent to U.S. Highway 89 (Highway 89) near Farmington, Utah. Defendants James Ivers, Katherine G. Havas, P & F Food Services, and Zions Credit Corp. (collectively, Arby's) appeal the trial court's ruling denying Arby's motion for partial summary judgment and granting UDOT'"s motion in limine precluding Arby's from presenting evidence of severance damages to a jury. In particular, Arby's argues that, as a result of UDOT's partial…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ford v. American Express Financial Advisors, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Utah State Road Commission v. MiyaUtah Supreme Court · 1974
  3. 8,960 Square Feet, More or Less v. State, Department of Transportation & Public FacilitiesAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State by State Road Commission v. Rozzelle Et Ux.Utah Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Hampton v. State Ex Rel. Road CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1968

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ivers v. Utah Department of TransportationUtah Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Utah Dep't of Transp. v. Target Corp.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2018
  3. Department of Transportation v. Admiral Beverage Corp.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API