Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Ivers v. Utah Department of Transportation

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 2007No. 20060061PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILKINS, Associate Chief Justice:

{1 The Utah Department of Transportation ("UDOT") condemned a portion of private property for the construction of a frontage road adjacent to U.S. Highway 89 in Farmington, Utah. The construction of the frontage road was part of a larger project to widen and elevate Highway 89. Petitioners James Ivers, Katherine G. Havas, and P & F Food Services (collectively, "Arby's") sought severance damages for loss of view and visibility. The trial court granted UDOT's motion in limine, precluding Arby's from presenting evidence of severance damages to a jury. Arby's…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. BrakeUtah Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Andrews v. CoxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
  3. Regency Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Longley v. Leucadia Financial Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Utah State Road Commission v. MiyaUtah Supreme Court · 1974

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. HoustonUtah Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Utah Department of Transportation v. Admiral Beverage Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Utah Department of Transportation v. IversUtah Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Peak Alarm Co. v. Salt Lake City Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Utah Dep't of Transp. v. Target Corp.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2018

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API