Legal Opinion
Totolo/King Joint Venture v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided October 20, 2009No. 09-104CPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
MILLER, Judge.
This pre-award bid protest is before the court after briefing on plaintiffs motion for reconsideration. Plaintiff Totolo/King Joint Venture (“plaintiff’), a Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business general contractor (“SDVOSB”), moves pursuant to RCFC *44459(a)(1) for reconsideration of this court’s decision granting defendant’s motion for judgment (and denying plaintiffs cross-motion for judgment) on the administrative record. The motion for reconsideration echoes plaintiffs unsuccessful cross-motion and insists that the Department of Veterans Affairs…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Impresa Construzioni Geom. Domenico Garufi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Centech Group, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Caldwell, Iii v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Fru-Con Construction Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Magnum Opus Technologies, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Acrow Corp. of America v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Fillmore Equipment of Holland, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Baley v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Englewood Terrace Ltd. Partnership v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.