Legal Opinion

Blair v. Shaw

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 3, 1951No. 38,430, 38,431, 38,432PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Price, J.:

The question in these three consolidated workmen’s compensation cases is whether the accidental injuries resulting in the death of all three decedents arose out of and in the course of their employment as mechanics by the respondent Chevrolet dealer in Fort Scott, Kansas.

Both the Commissioner and trial court held that the fatal injuries were compensable, and from such rulings the respondent and its insurance carrier have appealed.

The factual background, concerning which there is no material dispute, is as follows:

The respondent, Shaw…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Rush v. Empire Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  2. Hilyard v. Lohmann-Johnson Drilling Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1949
  3. Kearns v. ReedSupreme Court of Kansas · 1932
  4. Covert v. John Morrell & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  5. Pearson v. Electric Service Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1949

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Kindel v. Ferco Rental, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1995
  2. Taylor v. Centex Construction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1963
  3. Scott v. HughesSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  4. Spurgeon v. Blue Diamond Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1971
  5. Ramseth v. Maycock & State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1956

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API