Legal Opinion
Ed Kraemer & Sons, Inc. v. Transit Casualty Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 17, 1987No. C0-86-1470PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FOLEY, Judge.
This declaratory judgment action was commenced by appellant Ed Kraemer & Sons, Inc. against respondents Transit Casualty Company and Mutual Service Casualty Insurance Company to establish insurance coverage and the duty to defend.
Kraemer appeals from that portion of the judgment determining priority of coverage and does not contest the trial court's conclusion that Transit and Mutual Service owe it no duty to defend. Transit filed a notice of review seeking reversal of the trial court’s determination that the Transit policy provided coverage to Kraemer in the underlying…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Waseca Mutual Insurance Co. v. NoskaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Woodrich Construction Co. v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Holm v. Mutual Service Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Integrity Mutual Insurance v. State Automobile & Casualty Underwriters InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Auto Owners Insurance Co. v. Northstar Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Northland Insurance Co. v. Continental Western Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- Transport Insurance v. Protective InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- United States Fidelity & Guarantee Insurance Company v. Commercial Union Midwest Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- Kolby v. Northwest Produce Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- Greentree Associates v. USF & G.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.