Legal Opinion

Earney v. Owen

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 3, 1957No. 19745PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Candler, Justice.

(After stating the foregoing facts). Code § 85-1609 provides that when an adjoining landowner, who is dissatisfied with the return of land processioners, files his protest thereto with the ordinary, and the proceeding is transmitted to the superior court, the case is to be docketed and tried in the “same manner and under the same rules as other cases.” The protest, like any other defensive pleading, may be amended at any stage of the cause. Watson v. Bishop, 69 Ga. 51 (2); Rattaree v. Morrow, 71 Ga. 528 (2b). And the issue on the trial of a protest to the processioners’…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McCollum v. ThomasonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  2. Rattaree v. MorrowSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884
  3. Hamilton v. First National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
  4. Rich v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  5. Clay v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Efstathiou v. SaundersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  2. Moore v. Georgia Power CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  3. International Paper Co. v. KightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  4. Shelton v. LongCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  5. Osborne v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API