Legal Opinion

Efstathiou v. Saunders

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 21, 1988No. 76680PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Benham, Judge.

Landowner/appellee Saunders applied to the district processioners to trace and mark the western boundary of his property. See OCGA § 44-4-2. Adjoining landowners, appellants Efstathiou, dissatisfied with the line run and marked by the processioners and county surveyor, filed a protest, and a jury trial was had. See OCGA § 44-4-9. This appeal is from the judgment entered on the jury verdict in favor of Saunders.

1. Appellants contend the trial court erred in denying their motions for new trial and for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. “The standard for granting a directed…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Yost v. TorokSupreme Court of Georgia · 1986
  2. Pendley v. PendleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
  3. Baldwin v. DavisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  4. Rothstein v. L. F. Still & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  5. Moore v. Memorial Medical Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ingram v. JIK Realty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  2. Drake v. PageCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  3. Kobryn v. McGeeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  4. Dixon v. Cook Banking Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  5. Drake v. PageCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API