Legal Opinion
Moore v. Georgia Power Company
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided June 16, 1970No. 45102PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Quillian, Judge.
On the trial of the issue formed by the filing of the protest, a verdict which is made the judgment of the court is conclusive upon the parties and their privies in title. Howland v. Brown, 92 Ga. 513 (17 SE 806); Davis v. Stone, 88 Ga. App. 766 (77 SE2d 775). However, where the processioners file the plat and return and no protest is made to the same, such plat and the lines marked thereon are only prima facie correct. Huff v. Holley, 101 Ga App. 292, 295 (113 SE2d 493); Bradley v. Chattanooga Iron &c. Co., 144 Ga. 478 (87 SE 465).
Code § 85-1609 provides that after a protest…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Darden v. RobertsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
- Howland v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
- Earney v. OwenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
- Norbo Trading Corporation v. WohlmuthSupreme Court of Georgia · 1967
- Philpot v. WellsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1943
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- D. C. E. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- Walker's L. P. Gas, Inc. v. PyeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- D. C. E. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- DCE v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- Martin v. McCartneyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970