Legal Opinion

Clay v. Smith

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 13, 1951No. 17342PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Almand, Justice.

Under the view we take of the case, it is unnecessary for us to pass upon the contention of the defendant that the auditor’s rulings on the special demurrers, in the absence of exceptions pendente lite, and the plaintiff’s election to file an amendment, became the law of the case. The rulings on the special demurrers were set out in the auditor’s report, and exceptions to these rulings were filed by the plaintiff, to which no objections were made by the defendant. The trial judge considered and passed upon these exceptions as being properly made, and in our view of the case we…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Becker v. DonalsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  2. Crittenden v. Southern Home Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  3. McCall v. FrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  4. Grace v. Interstate Bond Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  5. Reynolds Banking Co. v. Southern Pacific Guano Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1913

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Cashin v. MarkwalterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
  2. Johnson v. Fulton CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1960
  3. Earney v. OwenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
  4. JEFFREY McELREATH MANUFACTURING CO. v. HillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
  5. Vaughan v. VaughanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API