Harvey v. Boehringer Ingelheim Corp.
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SULLIVAN, J.
The defendants Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation (Boehringer) and W.E. O’Neil Construction Company (O’Neil) appeal from the judgment granting the motion for summary judgment filed by the intervening plaintiff, Peter Gisondi & Company (Gisondi). On appeal, Boehringer and O’Neil claim that the trial court improperly found that no genuine issue of material fact existed as to their three count counterclaim against Gisondi and that Gisondi was entitled to judgment as a matter of law. We reverse the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts are relevant to the disposition of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hammer v. Lumberman's Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Connell v. ColwellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- D.H.R. Construction Co. v. DonnellySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Plouffe v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- Kakadelis v. DeFabritisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Smith v. Town of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Rockwell v. QuintnerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Kramer v. PetisiConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Mott v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LPConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Carrasquillo v. CarlsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.