Legal Opinion

Kramer v. Petisi

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 27, 1999No. AC 18078PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DUPONT, J.

This is an action to quiet title in which the plaintiffs, Myra Kramer and Gary Kramer, appeal from the judgment of the trial court rendered following the granting of a motion for summary judgment as to count eight of their complaint in favor of the defendants Robert Scanlon and Theresa Stetson-Scanlon.1 On appeal, the plaintiffs claim that the motion for summary judgment was improperly granted because issues of material fact exist as to whether the plaintiffs acquired the disputed property by adverse possession. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The following facts…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Miller v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  2. D.H.R. Construction Co. v. DonnellySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  3. Doty v. MucciSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  4. Gateway Co. v. DiNoiaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  5. Hertz Corp. v. Federal InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Tryon v. Town of North BranfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
  2. Rudder v. MAMANASCO LAKE PARK ASS'N, INC.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2006
  3. Zeller v. ConsoliniConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
  4. Top of the Town, LLC v. Somers Sportsmen's Ass'nConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  5. Young v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API